We usually hear or read about different achievement tales. But what exactly is achievement plus what criteria could companies employ to find achievement? What factors lead to a lucrative project? The factor of the post is to define project achievement criteria, explain their difference with success factors plus analyse their importance inside project administration methodology.
One of the vaguest concepts of project administration is project achievement. Since each individual or number of those who are concerned in a project have different requires plus expectations, it is very pretty unsurprising that they understand project achievement inside their obtain option of knowing Cleland & Ireland, 2004, p2. "For those involved in a project, project achievement is normally thought of as the accomplishment of certain pre-determined project goals" Lim & Mohamed, 1999, p244 whilst the average person has different views, commonly based about consumer reassurance. A classic example of different attitude of lucrative project is the Sydney Opera Home project Thomsett, 2002, that went 16 times over budget plus took 4 times more to finish than originally planned. But the final impact that the Opera Home created was thus big that nobody remembers the original missed objectives. The project was a big achievement for the individuals plus at the same time a big failure within the project administration attitude. On the other hand, the Millennium Dome inside London was a project about time basically budget however, in the eyes of the British persons was considered a failure because it didnt deliver the awe plus glamour that it was imagined to generate Cammack, 2005 pest control athens ga . "In the same way that standard demands each conformance to the specifications plus fitness for employ, project achievement demands a combined product achievement service, happen, or outcome plus project administration success" Duncan, 2004.
The difference between criteria plus factors is fluffy for most people. The Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary describes a criterion as "a standard by which you determine, decide about or deal with something" whilst a factor is explained as "a truth or condition that affects the result of something". Lim & Mohamed applied those definitions to project achievement plus illustrated the difference as show inside Figure 1. It is well-defined now that critical factors can cause a series of events that ultimately meet up with the overall achievement criteria of the project, thus they shouldnt be chosen as synonymous terms.
Many lists of achievement criteria have been introduced inside the past years by different scientists. Primal achievement criteria have been an integrated element of project administration theory provided that early definitions of project administration included the thus called Iron Triangle achievement criteria cost, time plus standard. Atkinson, 1999, p338
Atkinson continues that "as a discipline, project administration has not really changed or developed the achievement measurement criteria inside almost 55 years". To meet up with the urgent demand for modernizing the from date achievement criteria, he suggest the Square Route figure 3 achievement criteria instead of the Iron Triangle, where he groups the criteria that other teachers have proposed. The main change is the addition of qualitative objectives instead of quantitative, including the advantages that different number of persons can acquire within the project. These benefits are seen from 2 views, 1 within the organisational view and something within the stakeholders view. It is evident that each element need benefit differently from projects. As an example 1 organisation can gain income from achieving strategic objectives whenever a project is finished plus at the same time these objectives have a severe ecological impact inside the stakeholders community. This means that a lucrative project should bargain between your benefits of the organisation and also the reassurance of end people. The fourth corner of the Square Root is the Information System which include the subjects of maintainability, dependability plus legality of project outcomes.
One of the "Squares root" edges, organisational benefits, drew much attention because of its importance plus it was further analysed. Kerzner 2001, p6 indicates three criteria within the company attitude inside order for a project to be successful. The first is that it should be finished "with low or mutually agreed upon reach changes", despite the reality stakeholders constantly have different views about projects results Maylor, 2005, p288. Second, "without disturbing the main work flow of the organization" because a project must aid organisations everyday operations plus try to create them better plus beneficial. Finally, it must be finished "without changing the organization culture" despite the reality projects are "almost only concerned with change with knocking down the older plus building up the new" Baguley, 1995, p8. A project managers main responsibility is to make certain that he delivers change merely where is necessary, otherwise he or she is bound to find strong resistance from most organisational departments Kerzner, 2001, p158 that ultimately can lead to project failure.
A more structured approach to project achievement is grouping the criteria into groups. Wideman 1996, p3-4 describes 4 groups, all of them time dependent: "internal project objectives efficiency throughout the project, benefit to customer usefulness inside the brief term, direct contribution inside the medium term plus future opportunity inside the lengthy term". The characterization of time dependent situated found on the truth that achievement fluctuates with time. Considering the future benefits of the organisation is really difficult, because inside certain instances they dont even know what they want, yet is vital to know what the project is trying to achieve after completion time thus that achievement criteria are clearly defined inside the early stages. This really is quite a different approach, because the focus moves within the present achievement criteria to the future, somehow a project is unsuccessful throughout setup whether it is judged by criteria like cost plus standard, however, in the long term it can change to become a thriving history. A good example of the hypothesis is hosting the Olympic Games inside Athens, Greece, that received mass critique each throughout the planning period, due to delays inside construction time, plus whenever it was completed, due to huge cost. But the advantages that Greece usually gain within the Olympic Games is completely understood after 5 or possibly 10 years within the hosting season Athens2004.com.
All the above success criteria "ought to be simple plus achievable plus, once defined, they ought to equally be ranked according to priority" Best Track Associates, 2003. Straightforward criteria simple to recognize by everyone concerned in the project plus consequently dedication is assured. Unrealistic criteria can set a failure label about numerous projects because of the unreachable guidelines, can generate low team respect plus team performance inside future projects plus finally generate unfair dissatisfaction amidst stakeholders. As for goal problems, it is very inevitable that aspects goes wrong and also the project manager are inside a tough condition where he should create the proper choice having inside mind that they have to sacrifice the significant achievement criterion.
As mentioned earlier, "achievement factors are those inputs to the administration program that lead directly or ultimately to the achievement of the project or business" Cooke-Davies, 2002, p185. Many project owners "intuitively plus informally determine their obtain achievement factors. However, when these factors are not clearly diagnosed plus taped, they usually not become element of formal project administration reporting task neither they become element of the historic project data" Rad & Levin, 2002, p18. Belassi & Tukel 1996, p144 categorized these factors into 5 distinct groups according that element they pertain to:
1. The project manager
Having a project manager is not going to guarantee the achievement of the project. He need a amount of abilities to employ throughout the project to steer the rest of the team to successfully complete all of the objectives. In the 2001 CHAOS report The Standish Group International, 2001, p6, organization, communication, quality, task, results, operational, realism plus technological abilities are mentioned as certain of the most crucial abilities a project manager could have to provide achievement. However, more resent analysis by Turner plus Muller 2005, p59 has figured "the leadership style plus competence of the project manager have zero impact about project success". It is pretty interesting to investigate why a highly decent specialist body for project owners published like a contradictive position. A possible answer can be found inside the truth that project managers results are complicated to prove plus even more complicated to measure. If the project is lucrative, senior administration usually probably claim that all outside factors were good. On the contrary, when it turns to become a failure, project manager quickly becomes the scapegoat.
2. The project team
Project owners are very fortunate when they have the option to choose their project team. More often, their team is inherited to the project from different sectors of the organisation. This is vital to have a advantageous project team to work with, with core abilities that is evolved to core competences plus abilities for the whole organisation. All members of the project team should be committed to the achievement of the project and also the overall mission of the business. Apart of their abilities plus dedication, project team members could have well-defined communication stations to get into "both the workable manager and also the project manager within a matrix company. Effective administration of the twin reporting is often a critical achievement factor for the project" PMBOK Guidebook, 2004, p215.
3. The project itself
The kind of a project underlines certain factors that are important to achievement. As an example, if a project is urgent, the critical factor therefore is time. The Wembley stadium is expected to be completely operational due to Mays 2006 FA Cup Final and therefore is the primary target. However, the increase of cost "that has thrown the managements calculations from kilter" Evans, 2005 was not a big matter at that time. The size, value of the project plus its uniqueness of activities is a challenge for the project manager whom is chosen to planning plus co-ordinating popular plus simple activities Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p144.
4. The organization
Top administration support is the principal achievement factor for numerous independent analysis groups Tukel & Rom, 1998, p48 CHAOS Report, 2001, p4 Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210 Tinnirello, 2002, p14 , that means that no project can finish successfully except the project manager secures true support within the senior or operational administration. It is extremely difficult to work inside a hostile environment where nobody knows the advantages that the project usually deliver to the organisation. "Stakeholder administration plus contract techniques amount of plus size of the contracts, interface between your different contracts and also the administration of contracts are individual achievement factors that are equally considered element of company issues" Torp, Austeng & Mengesha, 2004, p4.
5. The outside environment
External environment is the political, financial, socio-culture plus technological PEST context inside that the project is executed. Factors like the weather, work accidents or the governments good or unfavourable laws can affect the project inside all of its phases. "Note that if your customer is from outside the organization, he need be considered as an external factor influencing the project performance" Belassi & Tukel, 1996, p145. Competitors need be accounted as outside factors that can undermine project achievement because the original project can be overshadowed by a more glamorous plus lucrative project announced by another organisation.
It is critical for a project manager to understand just what stakeholders consider as a lucrative project. In order to avoid any shocks at the end of the project, there is an urgent should identify the various views of what achievement means prior to the project goes live. It is also vital to remember that achievement criteria are the guidelines by which a project are judged, whilst achievement factors are the facts that shape the result of projects. Success criteria have changed considerably from time plus moved within the classic iron triangles view of time, cost plus standard to a broader framework such as benefits for the organisation plus consumer reassurance. An additional framework to capture achievement criteria depending about time was equally described. As for achievement factors, these were grouped into 5 distinct sets and also the literature views were discover to contradict found on the matter of how critical a project manager is to the final achievement of the project. A common factor mentioned by numerous writers is senior administration support for the project plus it is very known among the most crucial factors off. In conclusion, early meaning of achievement criteria can confirm an undisputed view of how the project are judged plus early recognition of achievement factors usually guarantee a safe path to provide achievement.
1. A Guidebook to Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2004, 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute, USA
2. Atkinson, 1999, Project management: cost, time plus standard, 2 right guesses plus a phenomenon, its time to accept other achievement criteria, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342, [Electronic]
3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful Projects: A guide for virtually any manager, Pitman Publishing, London UK, p8
4. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A modern framework for determining critical success-failure factors inside projects, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic]
5. Cambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK
6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of Project Management - first session, MSc inside Project Management, Lancaster University
7. Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design plus implementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA
8. Cleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Managers Portable Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 210
9. Cooke-Davies, The "real" achievement factors about projects, International Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp. 185190, [Electronic]
10. Duncan, 2004, Defining plus Measuring Project Success, Project Management Partners, [Online], Available: http://www.pmpartners.com/resources/defmeas_success.html , [2005, Nov.4]
11. Evans, 2005, Overdue plus over budget, repeatedly again, The Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic]
12. Kerzner, 2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling plus Controlling, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York
13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic planning project administration with a project administration maturity model, Wiley & Sons, NY, page 158
14. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic]
15. Maylor, 2005, Project Management, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project, Prentice Hall, UK, p288
16. Rad & Levin, 2002, The Advanced Project Management Office, St.Lucie Press, USA, page 18
17. Right Track Associates, 2003, Defining project achievement, [Online], Available: http://www.ittoolkit.com/cgi-bin/itmember/itmember.cgi?file=assess_pmsuccess.htm , [2005, Nov.5]
18. The official url of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, [Online], Available: [http://www.athens2004.com/en/Legacy] , [2005, Nov.6]
19. The Standish Group International, 2001, Extreme CHAOS: The Standish Group International, [Electronic]
20. Thomsett, 2002, Radical Project Management, Prentice Hall, USA, page 16
21. Tinnirello, 2002, New Directions inside Project Management, Auerbach, USA, page 14
22. Torp, Austeng & Mengesha, 2004, Critical Success factors for project performance: a study on from-end exams of large public projects inside Norway
23. Tukel & Rom, 1998, Review of the Characteristics of Projects inside different industries, Journal of Operations Management, Vol 16, pp43-61
24. Turner & Muller, 2005, The project managers leadership style as a achievement factor about projects, Project Management Institute, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp 49-61
25. Wideman, 1996, Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type, paper presented to the Southern Alberta Chapter, Project Management Institute, Calgary Symposium